RE: gnome yellow sticky project (projects)
- From: FONTENELLE Olivier <Olivier Fontenelle isr alcatel-alsthom fr>
- To: "'gnome-list gnome org'" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: gnome yellow sticky project (projects)
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:23:06 +0100
Tom Tromey wrote :
>>Probably it makes the most sense to use the standard CORBA Event
>>Service. Then the Gnome Event Manager program would just be a special
>>instance of an Event Channel object.
Isn't it a bit heavy ? What about starting with your IDL which are
lightweight -- and therefore easier to implement IMHO ?
OTOH I think someone said on the MICO list that he was working
on the implementation of the Event Service.
>>Probably all the Event Service code should be put into a library for
>>easy reuse.
Or better : be sent to MICO developpers for inclusion.
>
>>Lately I've been thinking that Gnome events should actually be use a
>>typed event channel; we could easily write the typed<->untyped
>>converter for this particular special case. The idea here is that
>>Gnome clients wouldn't have to decode `any' objects coming from the
>>Gnome event manager; these would have a (mostly-) known format.
But this means that we then have to define a type, doesn't it ?
(from what I've understood from the Event Service spec, typed
event channels require such a beast)
>
>>So in the short term, I think the answer is: you can't really start,
>>unless you want to write the event code. If you do want to do this, I
>>can send you all the details of what I think we want. If there is
>>interest, I can post them here.
I've started a basic implementation of GnomeObserve.idl as found
in your package, in C++ and for MICO. Well, I'm rather slow and
not very good at C++ :)
Regards,
-- Olivier
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]