Re: GNOME -- status and future.
- From: Toshio Kuratomi <badger prtr-13 ucsc edu>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME -- status and future.
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:33:42 -0800
On Fri, 06 Feb, 1998 at 11:30:22PM +0100, Christian Leutloff set free these words:
>
> Can we please use javadoc like documentation!? The comments for the
> documentation starts with /**
>
> Here's an example:
>
> /**
> * here is the description for the following class, method, variable, ...
>
> * @author Christian Leutloff
> * @version 0.1, 06.02.1998
> */
>
> public class ...
> {
> /**
> * the first function
> * @param initialValue
> * @return something useful
> */
> public usefulType firstFunc(initType inital)
> {
> ...
>
>
> The javadoc program generates from these comments really useful
> documentation. Look at the JDK documentation which is generated with
> javadoc.
>
I was thinking this too but here's the question I can't resolve by myself:
How well does javadoc work with non-OO code? And with OO C Code (like gtk)?
-Toshio
--
badger \"The Difference between today and yesterday is not so much what has
@prtr-13 \ changed between then and now as what I hope to change by tomorrow."
.ucsc.edu \~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]