Re: Mico Performance && Re: mico RPMS
- From: Benedikt Heinen <Benedikt Heinen infrasys ascom ch>
- To: Ryoga no baka <barrows oswego oswego edu>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mico Performance && Re: mico RPMS
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 11:16:40 +0100 (CET)
> > It takes quite awhile to compile. about 35min on my ppro 200 w/ 32MB
> > and w/o X and hardly anything else running.
> Kewl. I have a lowly P75, and it'd take quite a while to compile :)
Well, I guess the compilation would take longer on a P75, OTOH a ppro200 isn't
everything that determines the speed of compilation. My system (2xPPro200 w/
128MB w/ X11, 3 RC5-clients, X11, Adabas D, Roxen Challenger, top and all
kinds of other "standard gadgets" running) compiles Mico (without using make
-j2 over both CPUs) in 17mins flat. I guess, this just goes off to show, how
important RAM is... Judging from the "top" running during compilation, the
make job occupied its CPU, while all my other "gadgets" were on the other
one.
Still, in this case you can half the time required for this by getting some
more RAM, I think 32MB are the same to g++ as 4 MB for are linux -- too
little... ;)
Benedikt
Windows 95: n.
32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit
operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written
by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]