Re: Failed to build GNOME at Tue Dec 22 04:48:51 CST 1998 (fwd)
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: "Bruce Z. Lysik" <eldrik logrus com>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Failed to build GNOME at Tue Dec 22 04:48:51 CST 1998 (fwd)
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:22:03 +0800 (WST)
If you don't specify a -r tag, CVS should update files with the same tag
as you used last time (it defaults to HEAD for the first checkout).
So if you do a "cvs checkout -r GNOME_STABLE gnome-libs", and then "cvs
update gnome-libs", you will get any updates on the GNOME_STABLE branch.
To switch back to the head, simply do a "cvs update -r HEAD gnome-libs".
Is this easier to understand?
James Henstridge.
--
Email: james@daa.com.au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Bruce Z. Lysik wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 23:41:52 +0800 (WST) James Henstridge wrote:
> > using the -r flag to CVS specifies a tag to check out on the CVS (so a tag
> > is basically a set of revisions for the different files). For branches,
> > you have a sticky tag that gets moved when new checkings are made to that
> > branch (GNOME_STABLE and HEAD for example).
> >
> > So -r whatever will do what you think it does. Note that AFAIK, only
> > gnome-libs and gnome-core have stable 1.0 branches so far. For other
> > packages, you are probably best checking out off the head (except for
> > things like ORBit where you may be using the FOR_PANEL tag).
>
> Er. This isn't too clear to me. I'm still wondering what branch you
> get if you don't specify anything with -r.
>
> If I do a 'cvs -z3 co gnome-libs' do I get GNOME_STABLE or HEAD?
>
> --
> Bruce Z. Lysik <eldrik@logrus.com> http://www.logrus.com/~eldrik/index.cgi
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]