Re: gnome
- From: Havoc Pennington <rhpennin midway uchicago edu>
- To: Jimen Ching <jching flex com>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 01:00:11 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Jimen Ching wrote:
>
> Just a short comment on the above qoute though; not all modern Unix
> variants support networking and physical disks (no hard disks).
>
All the ones that would benefit from Gnome do, probably. But even so - if
they are remotely Posix or X/Open or otherwise close to standard Unix,
Gnome can probably be made to work with a few relatively minor changes.
> the old method as well. So in my professional opinion, it is wiser to
> stick with the old method for now, until the new kernel philosophies are
> better understood. Putting a kernel API in a library is just bad design,
> when applied to monolithic kernel.
>
It may be "bad" in some academic sense, but it works, and the same can not
be said for your solution.
> Also, where are all the fears coming from? It won't work on this system,
> it won't work on that system.
This is not what we want. We want it to work on all these systems, and
within a reasonable timeframe. You may not want that. But your conclusion
does not follow, given our goals.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]