Re: Localisation...

[Christopher Curtis <ccurtis ee fit edu>]

On 15 Aug 1998, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> Christopher Curtis <ccurtis@ee.fit.edu> writes:
> 
> > So what not?  NT calls itself C2 certified, even though it only applies to
> > NT 3.51 without a floppy drive and not attached to a network.
> 
> What is your point?

Just saying that this does not detract from the overall system. ie,
claiming POSIX compatibility does not make you look weaker, even if the
standard itself is weak (C2 is hardly worth clamoring about, but if Linux
were to be C2 certified, you'd definately hear about it.)

--
Christopher Curtis               - http://www.ee.fit.edu/users/ccurtis
                                 - System Administrator, Programmer
Melbourne, Florida  USA          - http://www.lp.org/