Re: Imlib 1.3 released...



On 22 Apr, Jim Pick shouted:
->  
->  raster@redhat.com writes:
->  
->  > * You need to recompile apps using Imlib1.3 cause data structures
->  > changed sizes.. :)
->  
->  I'm just about to compile some stuff with gdk-imlib 1.2.
->  
->  If imlib 1.3 is "released code" (versus pre-release code) as the version
->  number suggests (unless I misunderstand the versioning scheme) -
->  wouldn't it be much better to increment the major version number in
->  the SONAME of the library rather than forcing everybody to recompile?

the soname is bumped up to 1.3 form 1.2.. its not major.. but the api
is still the same thu no majore revision.. maybe your and my ideas
about minor and major versins are different.. :)

->  You do this so the old version and the new version can be installed on
->  the system at the same time.
->  
->  Imlib isn't ready for production apps if you introduce new versions
->  that will break compatibility on existing "production" apps installed
->  on the system.  That's what the library versioning is there to fix.

either way.. everyone re-compiled gnome every day anyway.. you have to
just to make sure it runs. :)

->  Apologies if that is what you are doing...
->  
->  Cheers,
->  
->   - Jim
->  

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
raster@rasterman.com       /\___ /\ ___/||\___ ____/|/\___  raster@redhat.com
Carsten Haitzler           | _ //__\\ __||_ __\\ ___|| _ /  Red Hat Advanced
218/21 Conner Drive        || // __ \\_ \ | |   \ _/_|| /   Development Labs
Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA   ||\\\/  \//__/ |_|   /___/||\\   919 547 0012 ext 282
+1 (919) 929 9443, 801 4392   For pure Enlightenmenthttp://www.rasterman.com/ 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]