Re: gnome-libs compilation fails - Berkeley db issue
- From: Geert Poels <Geert Poels skynet be>
- To: Wayne Schuller <k_wayne linuxpower org>
- Cc: gnome-libs-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome-libs compilation fails - Berkeley db issue
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:21 +0200
Thanks for this input.
Using 'set branch' works on 1.0, 1-0, basically everything.
So I enter 1-0, do a set branch and those files listed
should be the gnome-libs under development ?
Currently stable version 220.127.116.11 is obtained from this 1-0 branch ?
I think gnome-libs HEAD CVS is a dead end branch.
The real 1.4 gnome libs is in gnome-libs-1-0 branch.
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 23:20, Geert Poels wrote:
> As somebody suggested, I took the cvs version.
> I noticed INSTALL instructions disappeared, maybe off for a rewrite ?
> Autoconf ((GNU Autoconf) 2.53) still generates errors.
> configure.in:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONFIG_HEADER
> configure.in:37: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
> configure.in:54: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
> configure.in:56: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
> configure.in:124: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL
> configure.in:134: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNOME2_GETTEXT
> configure.in:223: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_UTMP
> I'm probably using it the wrong way.
> gnome-libs-devel mailing list
> gnome-libs-devel gnome org
] [Thread Prev