Re: gnome_about_new arguments



On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:

> For GNOME 2.0, they are now in the order
> 	title,
> 	version,
> 	copyright,
> 	comments, <-- Note the different order of this and 'authors'
> 	authors,
> 	documenters, <-- NEW
> 	translator_credits, <-- NEW
> 	logo.

I have said this several times and will say again:
if we are already changing gnoem_about_new syntax, please change it to
take a struct { char *name; char *url; char *email;}* as the author,
documenter, and translator lists. I don't know what the current plan is,
but I assume soemthing like encoding the email address in the name
(between <> characters) or making every second item in the authors list be
the URL associated with the previous author, but I think these are all bad
hacks and not as straightforward as passing dedicated structs.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
A man's best friend is his dogma.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]