Re: gnome_about_new arguments
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
- Cc: gnome-libs-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome_about_new arguments
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:38:26 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> For GNOME 2.0, they are now in the order
> title,
> version,
> copyright,
> comments, <-- Note the different order of this and 'authors'
> authors,
> documenters, <-- NEW
> translator_credits, <-- NEW
> logo.
I have said this several times and will say again:
if we are already changing gnoem_about_new syntax, please change it to
take a struct { char *name; char *url; char *email;}* as the author,
documenter, and translator lists. I don't know what the current plan is,
but I assume soemthing like encoding the email address in the name
(between <> characters) or making every second item in the authors list be
the URL associated with the previous author, but I think these are all bad
hacks and not as straightforward as passing dedicated structs.
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
A man's best friend is his dogma.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]