Hi What about switching to unstable dependencies but maintaining very good wiki documentation about the trouble we went through ? This way not everyone of us would have to fight and hack through problems but only the first one to encounter them. When exactly do you want to go for unstable ? At the moment I have a Ubuntu 10.10 running and it is surprisingly stable... But not rock solid. Cheers Thorsten Sick Am Samstag, den 28.08.2010, 20:11 -0500 schrieb Stef Walter: > Some of the things we need to integrate into seahorse and gnome-keyring > (like gsettings) are only available in unstable versions of glib or > unreleased versions of Fedora and Ubuntu. > > Usually we've tried to keep development simple by not requiring a > development stack of unstable libraries. However it seems like this is > unrealistic during the transition to GNOME 3 when there'll be stuff we > need to migrate to that's not yet stable and released. > > Are we okay with allowing unstable dependencies until after GNOME 3 or > so, even though this raises the barrier for development? > > Cheers, > > Stef > _______________________________________________ > seahorse-list mailing list > seahorse-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/seahorse-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil