Re: Common server activation

From: Waldo Bastian <bastian ens ascom ch>
To: Simon Hausmann <tronical gmx net>
CC: Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>, "gnome-kde-list gnome org" <gnome-kde-list gnome org>, Steffen Hansen <stefh mip sdu dk>, sopwith redhat com, kde-devel kde org, matt gnome-support com, nat nat org
Subject: Re: Common server activation
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:49:50 +0200

Simon Hausmann wrote:
[LOTS OF STUFF]

Do I understand the problem correctly by stating that we need:

* A uniform way to find the naming/service cq. trader.

* A uniform way (idl?) to access this service.

* A naming scheme (capabilities scheme?) shared across both 
  desktops. 

That is then enough for an application to get a reference to
the required CORBA service object.

The naming server/trader (which one do we preferably use?)
will need to know which CORBA services exist and how to 
activate them. If we can't agree on a common scheme for this,
it should still be possible to support both scheme's right?

Cheers,
Waldo

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]