Re: Infrastructure | Request to archive the gspell project (#700)

["Michael Catanzaro (@mcatanzaro)" <gitlab-issues gnome org>]

Title: GitLab

Michael Catanzaro commented:

From my perspective, it's fine to archive the copy of gspell in GNOME's GitLab.

FWIW I do not agree. We have several active projects depending on gspell:

elements/core/evince.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/core/gedit.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/core/gnome-builder.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/core/gnome-software.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/world/evolution.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/world/geary.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/world/gitg.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst
elements/world/gnome-recipes.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst

This is not going to be so easy to roll back like it was for tepl and amtk. These dependencies need to be dropped before the repo is archived.

P.S. I'm still waiting for an explanation as to what happened to your other projects in #564 (comment 1086095).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab.
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org. If you'd like to receive fewer emails, you can unsubscribe from this thread or adjust your notification settings.