Re: DB issues with WPMU
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub bethesignal org>
- To: gnome-infrastructure gnome org
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Subject: Re: DB issues with WPMU
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:49:37 +1100
<quote who="Owen Taylor">
> create index wp_1_options_autoload on wp_1_options (autoload);
>
> And sure enough 'show processlist' suddenly went from 90+ active
> connections to just a couple.
Great, thanks.
> Even with the index added, caching feed data in the options table seems
> weird and perverse. I wonder if it is expected that for a installation the
> size of blogs.gnome.org some other object cache is installed, and the
> default object cache behavior is just a fallback to get something going
> quickly.
Yeah, using the database as the persistent cache for feeds and such is there
mostly for "run a single WordPress easily without doing insane stuff on
every page load" use cases.
I'll add the APC-based object cache support to WPMU, and watch how it goes
to nut out a sensible size for the APC user cache.
Ultimately, I'd love to put blogo on another machine, so its rather unique
abuse of Apache and MySQL -- compared to anything else we run -- can be
segmented away from more, uh, critical infrastructure. :-) Thoughts on this?
Thanks,
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2010: Wellington, NZ http://www.lca2010.org.nz/
"We are peaking sexually when they are peaking. And two peaks makes a
hell of a good mount." - SMH
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]