Re: Receiving objects: 44% (121381/272167), 124.05 MiB | 78 KiB/s
- From: Jeff Schroeder <jeffschroed gmail com>
- To: Pierre <pierre pwi dyndns biz>
- Cc: gnome-infrastructure gnome org
- Subject: Re: Receiving objects: 44% (121381/272167), 124.05 MiB | 78 KiB/s
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:07:31 -0700
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Pierre <pierre pwi dyndns biz> wrote:
>> Other European users seeing a similar image?
>>
>> Simos
>
> From Bordeaux (France), I see :
>
> $ ping svn.gnome.org
> PING svn.gnome.org (91.189.93.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from cobalt.canonical.com (91.189.93.3): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=74.5 ms
> 64 bytes from cobalt.canonical.com (91.189.93.3): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=74.2 ms
> 64 bytes from cobalt.canonical.com (91.189.93.3): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=70.4 ms
> 64 bytes from cobalt.canonical.com (91.189.93.3): icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=71.0 ms
>
> $ ping git.gnome.org
> PING git.gnome.org (209.132.176.202) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from git.gnome.org (209.132.176.202): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=262 ms
> 64 bytes from git.gnome.org (209.132.176.202): icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=262 ms
> 64 bytes from git.gnome.org (209.132.176.202): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=258 ms
> 64 bytes from git.gnome.org (209.132.176.202): icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=260 ms
>
> # mtr -rwc5 git.gnome.org
> HOST: kermit.pwi.net Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> 1. moustik.pwi.net 0.0% 5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0
> 2. 88.182.20.254 0.0% 5 53.5 53.2 52.3 53.9 0.6
> 3. 213.228.9.190 60.0% 5 54.7 54.8 54.7 54.9 0.1
> 4. bzn-crs16-1-be1100.intf.routers.proxad.net 0.0% 5 63.4 62.6 61.7 63.4 0.8
> 5. th2-crs16-1-be2000.intf.routers.proxad.net 0.0% 5 65.0 63.5 62.5 65.0 1.0
> 6. xe-11-1-0.edge3.Paris1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 63.4 63.3 62.7 63.9 0.5
> 7. ae-32-56.ebr2.Paris1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 68.0 66.1 63.6 68.8 2.4
> 8. ae-1-100.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 73.1 71.2 66.9 76.2 3.5
> 9. ae-43.ebr1.London2.Level3.net 0.0% 5 73.2 74.0 71.3 82.3 4.7
> 10. ae-47-107.ebr2.London2.Level3.net 0.0% 5 71.4 78.1 71.4 82.8 5.0
> 11. ae-42-42.ebr1.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 71.5 71.3 69.8 72.6 1.1
> 12. ae-100-100.ebr2.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 70.9 72.1 69.7 77.0 2.9
> 13. ae-41-41.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 136.8 137.3 136.6 138.5 0.8
> 14. ae-71-71.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 137.2 140.7 137.2 148.1 4.5
> 15. ae-74-74.ebr4.NewYork1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 143.7 140.4 136.8 143.7 3.0
> 16. ae-2.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 278.4 278.8 276.9 280.3 1.3
> 17. ae-74-74.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net 0.0% 5 228.5 232.0 227.0 237.4 4.6
> 18. ae-23-79.car3.SanJose1.Level3.net 20.0% 5 275.2 277.8 275.2 280.4 2.2
> 19. te-4-1-73.rp0-1.snjsca13.Level3.net 60.0% 5 228.6 229.5 228.6 230.5 1.3
60% packet loss? Yeah that is certainly a problem. Strange but there
is 0% loss to this device from Beverly Hills, CA.
> 20. g2-2-0.a1.hywr.broadwing.net 20.0% 5 231.2 230.3 227.9 232.4 1.9
> 21. 216.140.0.65 20.0% 5 230.5 229.8 226.1 231.3 2.5
> 22. p2-0-0.a0.phnx.broadwing.net 20.0% 5 339.5 339.1 335.2 340.9 2.7
> 23. 216.142.38.22 20.0% 5 304.7 309.5 304.7 313.0 3.8
> 24. git.gnome.org 20.0% 5 303.0 308.2 303.0 313.0 4.8
Since you only sent 5 packets in that mtr output, can you run it for
about a minute and send us the output again?
Subversion supports a transparent write-through proxy[1] that would
get around some of the problems we are seeing. Oh git gods *cough
owen* does git have any support for something like this? Google
doesn't make it look so promising. Perhaps cloning from a
geographically local server and pushing to a remote at git.gnome.org?
I'm throwing out random ideas but this does seem like an issue.
[1] http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.5_releasenotes.html#webdav-proxy
--
Jeff Schroeder
Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
http://www.digitalprognosis.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]