Je mer, 2019-04-24 je 10:32 +0200, Andre Klapper skribis:
, as exposed in #324), but coherence across modules should be kept.I agree that it would be good to consider renaming all master branches.
Then mightn't it be better to bring up the topic with GNOME and/or Git upstream? Because it would be a bit of a mess if every project could decide for themselves what to call their master/mainline branch. For infrastructure reasons, it seems to me that it would be best if the name of that branch were uniform. I would like that name to be something other than "master", which is a bit clunky, inaccurate, and prone to cause offence, but I'd rather have that than a broken infrastructure. With kindness, Carmen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part