Re: Requesting string break and (small) UI break freeze for gnome-control-center
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: GNOME 2 release team <release-team gnome org>, Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>, Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>, gnome-doc-list <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Requesting string break and (small) UI break freeze for gnome-control-center
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:17:31 -0400
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Matthias Clasen
<matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
>>> >> Matthias has spent his weekend fixing some of the glaring UI bugs in
>>> >> the control center network panel.
>>> >>
>>> >> The new changes primarily address this bug:
>>> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682270 and the new UI looks
>>> >> a little different from before and much closer to the mockups provided
>>> >> by Allan: http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=223831
>>> >>
>>> >> There are 6 new strings:
>>> >>
>>> >> * "today" (shown in the wireless panel last-used page)
>>> >> * "yesterday" (shown in the same place)
>>> >> * "never" (shown in the same place)
>>> >> * "%i day ago"(shown in the same place)
>>> >> * "Out of range" (shown in the main wireless panel)
>>> >> * "Not connected" (shown in the VPN window)
>>> >
>>> > I think only the first 2 are new strings, the others were already used
>>> > elsewhere.
>>> > There is one other string change, though. I've added a period at the end of
>>> >
>>> > Network details for %s including password and any custom configuration
>>> > will be lost
>>> >
>>> > That is obviously mostly cosmetic, and can easily be left for later if
>>> > you prefer.
>>>
>>> Actually, the 'never', 'today' and 'yesterday' string additions are
>>> also cosmetic and can easily be left out.
>>>
>>> Aaand... now I realize that Richard forgot to cc the docs and i18n
>>> teams, so we'll never get their ok... CCing them now.
>>
>> Fine by me. We still need to redo many of those pages anyway.
>>
>
> Thanks. So far I counted one r-t approval, an a docs team nod. Given
> that I wrote the patches myself, I was going to hold of on approving
> them, but I am obviously in favor, so maybe that puts the release team
> over the hump. Any reaction from the i18n side about the string
> changes and additions ? As I said earlier, we can easily merge the
> branch without the string changes. Just let me know what you prefer.
>>
Doesn't look like anybody on the 18n side is listening... Richard, can
you merge the branch without the string changes ?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]