Re: Release set inclusion criteria?

[Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>]

Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 03:55 -0400, Chris Leonard a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> wrote:
> 
> >> The importance of this is that WebKitGTK+ is not presently a member of
> >> any Release Set (other than OLPC) and it is not getting the L10n it
> >> deserves.
> >>
> >> Yes, it is absolutely true that WebKitGTK+ has other issues with it's
> >> i18n at present, but making it more visible can only help that i18n
> >> issue get the attention it requires.
> >
> > There are several other external packages that contain visible strings
> > in GNOME (notably those hosted on the Translation Project). We (I?)
> > choose at some point to limit ourselves to GNOME git + some freedesktop
> > translation stats. It's somewhat arbitrary and we can decide to change
> > it or add more exceptions. But generally-speaking I find it rather
> > frustrating to have statistics on packages you may have to wait several
> > months before anyone react upstream :-/
> >
> > As for WebKitGTK+, it's not an option to make it more visible until DL
> > can generate a proper POT file. The last time it succeeded was on
> > 2010-12-27!
> 
> Yes, I am painfully aware of the failure of WebKitGTK+ to provide an
> adequate fix for their i18n issue.  Part of my reasoning for wanting
> it to make it more visible (other than the fact that all GNOME-based
> web-browsing depends on it) is to draw greater attention to the i18n
> issue.

Hey Gil, stuff for your next blog post :-)

Claude