Re: WebKitGTK+ i18n



On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> wrote:
> I had to manually intervene on the server to update the SVN repo, but
> now it seems to produce a correct POT file!
>
> I'd like to thank you Chris for your perseverance to solve this issue,
> and also Martin Robinson for his contribution.

I'd like to thank Claude and Martin as well for teaming up to work on
this long overdue bugfix.

I would like to make an appeal ot all language teams to work on
completing the WebKitGTK+ PO files and submitting them via vertimus.

http://l10n.gnome.org/module/webkit/

There is a further step needed t oget them upstreamed (posting
completed PO files as tickets on the webkit tracker, but having
complete PO files is the first step.

Although it is not tagged is such a way as to draw attention,
WebKitGTK+ is very important to a fully localized Gnome web-browsing
experience (i.e. Epiphany and Sugar Browse).  I think we can all agree
that a localized web-browser is essential.

The following collection of tickets filed in the GNOME Bugzilla would
suggest that Epiphany developers share the concern that I have about
the current status of WebKitGTK+ L10n, and now we finally have a
chance to close these!

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=610094%2C+610095%2C+610102%2C+610103%2C+610106%2C+610109%2C+610110%2C+610111%2C+610112%2C+610113%2C+610115%2C+610118%2C+610120%2C+610125%2C+610128%2C+610129%2C+610135%2C+610138%2C+610139%2C+610142%2C+610144%2C+610145%2C+610146%2C+610147%2C+610149%2C+610150%2C+610151%2C+610153%2C+610155%2C+610158%2C+610159%2C+610160%2C+610161%2C+610162%2C+610163%2C+610164%2C+610165


Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Warmest Regards,

cjl


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]