Re: Requesting freeze break for evolution-data-server 3.2
- From: Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>
- To: Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Requesting freeze break for evolution-data-server 3.2
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:11:00 +0200
Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 à 07:42 +0200, Milan Crha a écrit :
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:26 -0700, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > I'm sorry, that wasn't intentional. Can I "fix" it by unmarking the
> > > string from translation for 3.2.x? This one shouldn't be shown to a user
> > > often, it's rather rare string, when a syntax of a filter doesn't match,
> > > which can happen only if a developer develops new filters, I believe.
> > Just request a freeze-break for 3.2.1. Unmarking the string doesn't fix
> > it but just creates another bug (string not marked for translation...).
> > As you probably doing that and I think that is fine to fix in 3.2.1, 1
> > of 2 from i18n.
> OK, I'm sorry for inconvenience and thanks for the suggestion and "1 of
> 2". I'm asking for the freeze break "officially" now. :)
> If I understand it correctly, and because I messed it and committed
> already, then if I get the second approval then I can just let it be
> (nothing more would be needed from my side), only if there will not be
> the second approval, then I should revert the commit in the gnome-3-2
> branch of eds. Is it correct?
Approval 2 of 2. Go in peace :-)
] [Thread Prev