Hi! > > Less error phrone and conformant to international standards. > > I still don't get it, how an encoding can be less error prone than > another? UTF-8 (Unicode) works universal for ANY language and charset and as such all modern editors can open it without problems. For many other encodings they have to guess which to use and as guessing is sometimes wrong - that is error prone. As others said - read the archive if you are interested in that discussion. Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part