Re: "Damned Lies" about desktop-docs?

Today at 16:42, Matic Žgur wrote:

> Dne 31.12.2006 (ned) ob 02:10 -0200 je Leonardo Fontenelle zapisal(a):
>> l10n-status had PO files for desktop-gpl, lgpl and fdl. I can't find
>> them in progress-g-o, i. e. inside gnome-desktop. Where are they?
> Is it OK to translate GPL, LGPL and other licenses? As far as I know,
> the only FSF-approved licenses are the English ones.

Sure it's allowed, but one would have to indicate that they're not
approved ("legally binding") translations.

There's a bug for xml2po about that:


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]