Re: Requesting string change approval in gnome-utils
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: Gnome Release Team <release-team gnome org>, gnome-doc <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Requesting string change approval in gnome-utils
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:05:30 +0100
Hi Vincent,
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 10:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le samedi 18 février 2006 à 15:54 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> > The patch attached to comment #10 of the bug report adds an error dialog
> > asking the user what to do (delete file or close), and another couple of
> > error dialogs; specifically, the most important addition is:
>
> Dumb question: isn't it simpler to just use another name now? We didn't
> yet release a stable version with this code, so changing the name now is
> not breaking anything...
People using Gnome from CVS (or Ubuntu Dapper) would not find their
custom dictionary sources anymore. But, hey: things from HEAD break
sometimes. ;-)
Anyway, as I said, the file that is causing the name clash is "stale",
and has been so since Gnome 2.0; I finally found the last working code
using a file for saving preferences: it's tagged for gnome-utils 1.4,
and it was created by GnomeConfig, before the preferences handling was
re-written to use GConf; after that, no code mentions such file.
So we can safely assume that we can delete the file - unless someone has
created a file called "gnome-dictionary" inside $HOME/.gnome2; hence the
conservative approach. I could rename the data directory to something
like "gnome-dictionary-2.0", but think of this as a way to sanitize
the .gnome2 directory. :-)
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
Emmanuele Bassi - <ebassi gmail com>
Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]