Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] addressbook fixes]
- From: Hans Petter Jansson <hpj ximian com>
- To: William Jon McCann <mccann jhu edu>
- Cc: Evolution Patches <evolution-patches lists ximian com>, GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>, GNOME Release Team <release-team gnome org>, Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] addressbook fixes]
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:27:35 -0500
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:22 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> Christian Rose wrote:
> > tis 2004-09-21 klockan 23.04 skrev Hans Petter Jansson:
> >
> >>>This patch has been approved by an addressbook maintainer (via the
> >>>evolution-patches list) and has been committed to head. Is it OK to
> >>>commit to the 2.8 branch? It is a minor change and has been tested.
> >>
> >>I just talked to JP about this, and we agreed that the string changes
> >>can't go in to the gnome-2-8 branch. However, the string additions
> >>related to the bug fix can go in if i18n approves.
> >
> > I'd like to know if this fixes some bug, and how important that bug is
> > considered. If the patch and the string additions are just a polishing
> > thing and not terribly important, it's most likely not gnome-2-8 branch
> > material.
> >
>
> Here is an updated patch. It is similar to the one that has been
> applied to head. It fixes a missing default value and removes spurious
> debug messages.
>
> It differs from the one on head in that it doesn't change existing
> strings and only adds one string to the schema.in.in file. This is done
> by using long descriptions that duplicate the short descriptions.
This is ok for gnome-2-8 if i18n agrees.
--
Hans Petter
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]