Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] addressbook fixes]



On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:22 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> Christian Rose wrote:
> > tis 2004-09-21 klockan 23.04 skrev Hans Petter Jansson:
> > 
> >>>This patch has been approved by an addressbook maintainer (via the 
> >>>evolution-patches list) and has been committed to head.  Is it OK to 
> >>>commit to the 2.8 branch?  It is a minor change and has been tested.
> >>
> >>I just talked to JP about this, and we agreed that the string changes
> >>can't go in to the gnome-2-8 branch. However, the string additions
> >>related to the bug fix can go in if i18n approves.
> > 
> > I'd like to know if this fixes some bug, and how important that bug is
> > considered. If the patch and the string additions are just a polishing
> > thing and not terribly important, it's most likely not gnome-2-8 branch
> > material.
> >
> 
> Here is an updated patch.  It is similar to the one that has been 
> applied to head.  It fixes a missing default value and removes spurious 
> debug messages.
> 
> It differs from the one on head in that it doesn't change existing 
> strings and only adds one string to the schema.in.in file.  This is done 
> by using long descriptions that duplicate the short descriptions.

This is ok for gnome-2-8 if i18n agrees.

-- 
Hans Petter



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]