Re: Request for freeze break for GNOME 2.8.x for gcalctool string



I wrote:
> Thanks. I take it that's 1 of 2 approvals, and I shouldn't apply this until
> I see a second approval?

I should have read the bug reports further comments first. Looks like
you just need one approval. I'll also take Danilo up on his fine offer 
of doing the commits.

Thanks!

------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------

Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Burridge <richb bos-mail1 eng sun com>
Subject: Re: Request for freeze break for GNOME 2.8.x for gcalctool string
To: danilo gnome org, menthos gnome org
Cc: gnome-i18n gnome org, release-team gnome org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-MD5: xxs+3Kbe2t+bARdVAxGH6Q==


Hi all,

> > > As already stated, I would really like that problem fixed aswell, so it
> > > would be useful having a patch that fixed that problem; a patch that
> > > could be discussed and then approved.
> > 
> > Patch is attached on bug 
> >   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152742
> > as
> >   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=31641&action=edit
> 
> Thanks. I'd like to see this problem fixed in GNOME 2.8.1, as the
> problem is a regression from before (these messages were marked for
> translation in previous GNOME releases), the messages are very visible,
> and GNOME 2.8.1 is our chance to fix this problem.
> 
> Thus, this patch has my string freeze approval, as long as the patch is
> committed as soon as possible and translators on this list are
> immediately notified when the patch has landed in CVS, so that they know
> when they would need to update their translations if necessary.

Thanks. I take it that's 1 of 2 approvals, and I shouldn't apply this until
I see a second approval?

> (as previously stated, the other patch by Danilo, patch #31605, would
> need no string freeze approval, as it doesn't touch any real
> translateable strings from the translator POV).

Okay. I'll apply this patch to the gnome-2-8 branch and CVS HEAD as soon as
I've worked my way through my mail backlog.

Thanks Danilo for making this bug fix easy. 

------------- End Forwarded Message -------------




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]