Re: Request for freeze break for GNOME 2.8.x for gcalctool string

[Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>]

fre 2004-09-17 klockan 16.10 skrev Rich Burridge:
> > > > As already stated, I would really like that problem fixed aswell, so it
> > > > would be useful having a patch that fixed that problem; a patch that
> > > > could be discussed and then approved.
> > > 
> > > Patch is attached on bug 
> > >   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152742
> > > as
> > >   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=31641&action=edit
> > 
> > Thanks. I'd like to see this problem fixed in GNOME 2.8.1, as the
> > problem is a regression from before (these messages were marked for
> > translation in previous GNOME releases), the messages are very visible,
> > and GNOME 2.8.1 is our chance to fix this problem.
> > 
> > Thus, this patch has my string freeze approval, as long as the patch is
> > committed as soon as possible and translators on this list are
> > immediately notified when the patch has landed in CVS, so that they know
> > when they would need to update their translations if necessary.
> 
> Thanks. I take it that's 1 of 2 approvals, and I shouldn't apply this until
> I see a second approval?

Good question -- I don't think we have formalized it in enough detail to
actually require two GTP approvals for string freeze stuff (as opposed
to release team approvals, where two approvals are actually required).

Usually we just assume one approval is enough for string freeze stuff,
so I'd say you're clear to do this. Unless Kjartan objects of course,
but that'd surprise me a lot in this case. 


Christian