Re: [gene-pool] Outstanding Evolution 2.0.0 Patches

[Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>]

Just checked the ChangeLog, e-book-backend-ldap.c, and the evo-patches
list, and can't find evidence that this change:

> 2004-09-06  Sivaiah Nallagatla <snallagatla novell com>
>                                                                                 
>         * backends/ldap/e-book-backend-ldap.c : Update
>         the ldap attribute names for calendar ui and free busy uri
>         fileds to match with what is present in evolutionPerson.schema

was backed out (or even sent to the list for approval).  This absolutely
has to happen before we ship 2.0.

Chris

On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 14:04 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> This is a bit tricky to track because the evolution-patches mailing list
> has had intermittent problems, but as far as I know we have the
> following patches waiting on approval from the release team
> 
> 65172/63170/61140
> -dobey's documentation patch covers these plus updates all the docs, it
> touch the code in 1 or 2 spots to load the correct doc book file,
> otherwise it makes no code changes
> -been approved by me with one minor change
> 
> 17338
> -not strictly necessary for 2.0.0 but really good to have
> -peer approved
> -needs r-t and i18n approval
> 
> 57443
> -second version of this peer approved
> -this gets us back to the 1.4 behaviour
> 
> 64974
> -this is a ui breakage but a rather bad regression
> -waiting for r-t approval and peer review
> 
> 65448
> -we've pulled this from the 2.0.0 list, upon reflection we don't think
> its serious enough to block 2.0.0
> 
> 62374
> -being peer reviewed currently
> 
> 64800 
> -being peer reviewed
> 
> There are two other ones we are looking at:
> 63894 (we cannot duplicate this however, unlikely to happen)
> 
> undefining the #DEVELOPMENT define to turn off the "unstable version"
> development warning
> 
> As frederic suggested in irc for future evolution releases we'll
> probably do the peer review first and then forward it on to r-t.
> 
> -JP