Re: request for freeze breakage - gok
- From: "Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: "David Bolter" <david bolter utoronto ca>
- Cc: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>, release-team gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: request for freeze breakage - gok
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:34:44 +0200 (CEST)
> module: gok
> maintainers: David Bolter, Bill Haneman
> bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152086
> patch: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=31390&action=view
>
> We've discovered that our gok-with-references.schemas.m4 file is busted.
>
> This doesn't matter for a casual install from tarball or cvs, but
> matters if a developer or translator decides to update the schemas.in
> file (as per the somewhat buried directions) however it means that 17
> strings are erroneously going unmarked; fixing the m4 file will cause
> the strings to become marked.
What will the user experience in this case? Or, what does the bug look
like in practice?
> If the i18n team thinks the strings can go in now, then we request
> release-team permission to apply patch:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=31390&action=view
You don't seem to have CCed the i18n people.
> If the i18n team thinks patch should go into 2.8.1 instead (which is
> what we request), then we will apply the patch post-2.8.0.
>
> If the release-team thinks the broken m4 macro is a 2.8.0 risk, we can
> apply an alternate, temporary patch which simply reverts/removes the
> broken macros such that the impact on the current string situation is nil.
>
> [note: that the m4 change came in from the i18n team (Sun i18n team that
> is) but that it was improperly applied due to a merge failure, and since
> we didn't run m4 manually the problem did not surface when the patch was
> initially introduced (before string freeze).]
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]