Re: [Fwd: GNOME CVS: gnome-nettool rodrigo]

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 16:39 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> mån 2004-08-30 klockan 16.24 skrev Rodrigo Moya:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 14:48 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> > > mån 2004-08-30 klockan 14.35 skrev Mark McLoughlin:
> > > > > Since I'm new to this, it seems I forgot to ask for approval on this
> > > > > commit. So I ask now, if not approved, I'll revert it in CVS.
> > > > 
> > > > 	From the point of view of the code freeze, you're fine - its only after
> > > > you release your tarball today that the code freeze comes into effect.
> > > > 
> > > > 	However, this looks like a string freeze break - I'd say the best thing
> > > > to do would be to revert and ask for permission to commit from
> > > > gnome-i18n - but at this point I wouldn't be surprised if they'd prefer
> > > > if you held off until 2.10.
> > > 
> > > Is there a link to the patch discussed somewhere, so we can have a look
> > > at it?
> >
> > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-nettool/src/gnome-nettool.glade?r1=1.13&r2=1.14
> 
> If this can wait, then yes I'd prefer it that way, and this to be
> reverted at the moment.
> 
> Otherwise I'd like to hear some motives on why it would be important
> enough to go in at this point.
> 
not really important, so just reverted it.
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>