Re: bug-buddy branched for 2.6
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- Cc: Fernando Herrera <fherrera onirica com>,desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org,release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: bug-buddy branched for 2.6
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:34:07 +0800
On 13/04/2004 6:44 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 23:53 +0200, Fernando Herrera wrote:
>
>
>> Hi to all!. I've just branched bug-buddy for gnome 2.6.
>>So gnome-2-6 is the stable branch, and HEAD is the branch development
>>for 2.7
>> New stuff for 2.7:
>> * Get ride of sendmail and move to HTTP POST (libsoup)
>>
>>
>
>Should this be xml-rpc instead?
>
>
Given that submitting bugs to bugzilla is pretty simple and
standardised, is there any benefit to using a non-standard bugzilla
feature here? All you really need to do is acquire a login cookie
(going to /query.cgi?goAheadAndLogin=1 will do that), then do a post to
/post_bug.cgi.
James.
--
Email: james@daa.com.au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]