Re: OT: Unicode and UTF-8 avoided?
- From: Karl Eichwalder <ke gnu franken de>
- To: Danilo Segan <dsegan gmx net>
- Cc: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>, Tim Janik <timj gtk org>,gnome-i18n gnome org, Beasty Crowd <beast gnome org>,Alper Ersoy <dirt gtk org>
- Subject: Re: OT: Unicode and UTF-8 avoided?
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:09:36 +0200
Danilo Segan <dsegan@gmx.net> writes:
> I'm living a bit on the edge and using Emacs from CVS (21.3.50.*), but
> it doesn't bring big improvements in that regard (at least I think,
> since it's not emacs-unicode branch, which aims to switch Emacs
> internally to UTF-8, which shouldn't be a big improvement on the user
> side, either).
Using 21.2 is a little bit dangerous - it can happen easily (c&p) that
different charsets end up in one buffer and Emacs will encode it as
ctext or iso-2022; Emacs 21.3 by defaults unify different encodings (at
least some of them) as UTF-8. That's a big advantage.
For serious work based on UTF-8 you will need the Emacs version from
CVS head - this one is also able to recognize the encoding of XML files
properly ;)
--
| ,__o
| _-\_<,
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]