Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: Rhythmbox branching
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: rhythmbox-devel gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: Rhythmbox branching
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:38:43 -0500
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 20:08, Christian Rose wrote:
> The only reason the translation status pages currently displays HEAD for
> rhythmbox is that rhythmbox seems to change stable branch/branch
> intended for translators every other week, and that I myself is not able
> to keep up with changing that information all the time. Thus, keeping it
> constantly at HEAD instead of a possibly already obsoleted or soon
> obsoleted branch seems to be the safer choice.
Ok. Well, it's not too complicated; we generally only have a stable
branch and an unstable branch at any one time. This is similar to how
various modules have a gnome-2-4 branch and HEAD. Right?
Presently the "stable" branch is RHYTHMBOX-0_6 and unstable is HEAD. I
doubt this will change for quite a while.
(Now of course the above is for CVS; in arch i use a number of branches,
but those all eventually map onto one CVS branch, so you don't need to
worry about them)
This is a digitally signed message part
] [Thread Prev