Re: translation-status.xml validation [Was Re: bonobo-activation... ]

["R.I.P. Deaddog" <deaddog deaddog org>]

On 2003-05-13(Tue) 16:11:53 +0200, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> > It seems to me that both gnome 2.2 and 2.4 use the same group IDs (such
> > as "desktop", "developer-libs"). Since status pages are still generated
> > correctly, this validation thing is probably not urgent; and Carlos'
> > code will also need changes if DTD is fixed. But is it fixable later?
> 
> I know about those errors. I did those and my system need them to work
> properly (well, if you change the ID correctly, it should work also).

But are the IDs directly used in status pages? People can be scared when
they see something else rather than "developer-libs", "extras" etc...

> Next change with status pages will use an internal ID and also a string
> to show the the "developer-libs", "desktop", etc strings so I can fix
> those errors without any visual change.

Yes, this change will have the least impact, though the release IDs will
become useless. Do it correctly from the ground up would need too much
change without much benefit...

Anyway, when your code generates the pages, is the output log available
somewhere? I hope I can pick up errors (POTFILES.*, po files errors etc)
there...

Abel

> The "correct" behaviour is that the .xml validate completely but those 4
> errors.
> 
> Cheers.
>  	
> > Abel
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Christian
> > > 
> > > 
> -- 
> Carlos Perelló Marín
> Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC)
> Linux Registered User #121232
> mailto:carlos@pemas.net || mailto:carlos@gnome.org
> http://carlos.pemas.net
> Valencia - Spain



-- 
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc

PGP signature