El jue, 06 de 03 de 2003 a las 14:32, Sven Neumann escribió: > Hi, > > Christian Rose <menthos@menthos.com> writes: > > > I believe there is some misunderstanding here. The issue is not AFAIK > > about using characters not available in latin-1, it's about using > > characters not available in plain 7-bit ASCII. That's a whole different > > topic, and support should not be an issue. I can't imagine a reasonably > > modern setup that doesn't support the latin-1 range of characters in > > fonts etc. > > I think you misunderstood my point. The suggested en_US.po file can > not be converted to ISO-8859-1 which means that the messages can not > be output on a terminal of a GTK+ user who uses an en_US.ISO-8859-1 > locale. This is a rather common setup and some of these messages are > by default output to the console. In my opinion an en_US translation > of GTK+ shouldn't use any non-latin1 characters unless there's a > strong reason to do so. Since the change is merely cosmetic, I don't > think that such a reason is given here. Same applies to other locales > such as de_DE, btw. > 7bit ASCII != iso-8859-1 for example, áéÃóúñ are 8bit ASCII (not 7bit ASCII) but those are inside iso-8859-1 because the "es" locale uses ISO-8859-1 charset and we have those characters. So I don't think you have any problem with those characters. > > Salut, Sven Cheers. > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n -- Carlos Perelló MarÃn mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org mailto:carlos.perello@hispalinux.es http://www.gnome-db.org http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Spain
Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmadadigitalmente