[Bug 115177] Changed - Even more string issues



Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115177

Changed by jan.moren@lucs.lu.se.

--- shadow/115177	Sun Jun 15 01:41:05 2003
+++ shadow/115177.tmp.7184	Sun Jun 15 10:46:00 2003
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 115177
 Product: Gnumeric
 Version: CVS
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: rh9
-Status: RESOLVED   
-Resolution: FIXED
+Status: REOPENED   
+Resolution: 
 Severity: minor
 Priority: Normal
 Component: General
 AssignedTo: jody@gnome.org                            
 ReportedBy: jan.moren@lucs.lu.se               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -243,6 +243,36 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From aguelzow@taliesin.ca  2003-06-15 01:41 -------
 The answer for the COUNTA example was correct 'missing' is not an
 empty cell!
 
 All the other problems have been fixed in cvs.
+
+------- Additional Comments From jan.moren@lucs.lu.se  2003-06-15 10:45 -------
+Reopening due to two outstanding issues:
+
+This one was missed:
+
+#: plugins/fn-stat/functions.c:5799
+msgid "x,meean,stdev"
+
+-- "mean"
+
+---
+
+#: plugins/fn-stat/functions.c:4549
+msgid ""
+"@FUNCTION=TREND\n"
+"@SYNTAX=TREND(known_y's[,known_x's,new_x's])\n"
+
+...
+
+"* If @known_x's is omitted, an array {1, 2, 3, ...} is used.\n"
+"* If @new_x's is omitted, it is assumed to be the same as @known_x's.\n"
+
+-- The docs imply that you can have @known_x's without @new_x's, but
+the function prototype contradicts this. Maybe the two lines should say:
+
+"* If @known_x's and @new_x's is omitted, an array {1, 2, 3, ...} is
+used.\n"
+
+




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]