Re: Wanted: the worst strings in Gnome
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <deaddog deaddog org>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Wanted: the worst strings in Gnome
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 02:36:23 +0800
On 2003-06-08(Sun) 19:18:56 +0200, Ole Laursen wrote:
> > > "IM Preedit style"
> > > "<big>S/Key Challenge Response</big>"
> > I'd be very surprised if there were a way to express these two
> > (without loosing their meaning) in a way that does not include
> > these exact words (except possibly for IM <-> input method).
>
> Maybe, maybe not. But in the past, I didn't understand no. 1 and I
> still don't understand no. 2. Cryptic strings are best accompanied by
> a comment in the code.
Crypto stuff is always not that easy to grasp. You can go to
http://www.cs.brown.edu/system/net_remote/skey/
for a nice introduction on what S/KEY is. And I wonder if these strings
can be replaced too.
Abel
> --
> Ole Laursen
> http://www.cs.auc.dk/~olau/
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
--
Abel Cheung
Linux counter #256983 | http://counter.li.org
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]