Re: gconf string breakage

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Christian Rose <menthos@menthos.com> writes:
> I'm a bit confused -- gnome-i18n@gnome.org hasn't been informed about a
> new gconf branch to use for gnome 2.0 development, and the one (HEAD)
> that's listed for use as per the last gconf branch info sent to
> translators at gnome-i18n@gnome.org (back in december 2000) has recently
> had up to nine string changes or string additions:

It's branched; use the gconf-1-2 branch which should have no string
changes. Sorry for not sending out mail.

Havoc