El dom, 28-04-2002 a las 02:06, R.I.P. Deaddog escribió: > On 28 Apr 2002, Christian Rose wrote: > > > sön 2002-04-28 klockan 01.23 skrev Carlos Perelló Marín: > > [...] > > > I prefer all modules in one page. It's more easy to look the > > > translations status but you are right, we should have a feature that > > > lets us see what things are at gnome core and which others are > > > "optional". > > > > I think this is a crucial feature. It seems many translators (including > > me) want to know what should be translated for the official Gnome 2.0 > > relase so we know what should be prioritized etc. This is currently > > impossible with the current unstable status report. > > Agreed. > > > > That said, instead of a seperate report as per my suggestion, this could > > perhaps be solved by grouping the core modules alphabetically in the > > unstable page in a top table, and after that having the extra ones in a > > seperate table below that, so that there are two tables in each page, > > and still only one unstable page. After all, less report pages means > > less pages to refresh each day. :-) > > > > Christian > > And there are other viable reasons to split pages. > One is usability: a gigantic page is really unconvenient to search for > the place you want. Another reason is the mere HTML size -- it's already > something like 270K in size. Adding extra thing can double it. > I'm afraid more buggy browsers may bomb on this :) > > Hey, My old 270K html page in only one line didn't broke any browser ;-) Almost I didn't get any bug report about it :-) > -- > Abel Cheung > GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc -- Carlos Perelló Marín mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org mailto:carlos.perello@hispalinux.es http://www.gnome-db.org http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Spain
Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente