Re: Guikachu 0.10 is to be released shortly

[Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>]

En dom, 2001-09-23 a 19:40, ERDI Gergo escribio:
> On 23 Sep 2001, Ole Laursen wrote:
> 
> > > Should I check in updated .po files (as in, updated to match the most
> > > recent .pot)? would that make translators' life easier or harder?
> > 
> > No, because then you might accidentally mess up someone's current
> > working copy of the translation - getting a CVS messed up .po file
> > back to a usable state is really painful (CVS and .po files really
> > don't mix very well). Fortunately, you always get a dotfile with
> > whatever you had before the cvs update command, but having to rename
> > it back to the name of the po file is still somewhat annoying.
> 
> OK. This is what I tought, but I wanted to make sure.
> 
> > But I just had a quick look at the po/ subdirectory - it seems you
> > don't include the latest .pot file. Doing that may have the potential
> > to help some people with slow net connections for whom it is a pain to
> > have all of the source installed just to run xml-i18n-update.
> 
> But the .pot file is a generated file, so it shouldn't be included in the
> CVS repository.
> Maybe I should put the .pot file somewhere on the website?

For example:
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gtp/status/extra/po/guikachu.pot

;-)

As I have said before, It's updated all days at 00:00 GMT


Bye
> 
> -- 
>    .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
>    \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
>     `---= cactus@cactus.rulez.org =---'
> Azt gondolom hogy gondolkodom, tehát azt gondolom hogy vagyok.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
-- 
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain

PGP signature