Re: I18N spam part II -- "reviewed" po files

[Fatih Demir <kabalak gmx net>]

On 22 Jul 2001 20:06:04 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> > It's true that informal reviewing is enough (that's my experience, not
> > necessary others), but inserting that reviewing information isn't bad.
> > Other applications can ignore that tag instead of segfault or refusing to
> > start, right? Don't think it's very harmful even if it's useless.
> 
> You're right. If you add a review date to the header field, similar to the
> po-revision-date, it starts to make more sense. Then you can easily
> see if the review is outdated.

Yes, that was intended originally. A couple of tags were in my mind:
X-Reviewed-By, X-Reviewed-Date, X-Reviewed-Score (don't hit me, I know
,-)).

> Maybe this was the idea all the time and I
> just didn't get it, sorry for that.

Hehe, fine. I fear there's still no big "enthuasism", feedback about
it..
--
kabalak / kabalak@kabalak.net / Fatih Demir
`-GNOME / ICQ:64241161 / GSM: +491749787080
 `-Editor / vim
  `-Filemanager / VFU