Re: Branching GConf

[Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld dkuug dk>]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:51:58AM +0100, Emese Kovacs wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gnome-i18n-admin@gnome.org
> > [mailto:gnome-i18n-admin@gnome.org]On Behalf Of Kjartan Maraas
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 11:34 PM
> > To: Keld Jørn Simonsen
> > Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> > Subject: Re: Branching GConf
> >
> >
> > Den 12 Dec 2000 22:56:59 +0100, skrev Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 12:15:07PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Colm has time to start working on some new features for GConf 2, so
> > > > I'm branching the stable version to gconf-1-0. The gconf-1-0 branch is
> > > > the one that's going to end up in GNOME 1.4.
> > > >
> > > > All bugfixes and such should go in both branches; unstable breakage
> > > > will go in HEAD. Will probably port HEAD to GLib 1.3.x in a while, but
> > > > not right away, I'd like to get closer to the 1.4 release before
> > > > making the diff between branches that large.
> > >
> > > Could somebody please tell me which gnome packages have both
> > > a stable  version and a development HEAD version. Please also give me
> > > the correct tags for the stable versions.
> > >
> >
> > stable branches:
> >
> > gnome-libs: "gnome-libs-1-0"
> > gnome-core: "gnome-core-1-2"
> > gnome-applets: "gnome-applets-1-2"
> > gnome-pim: "gnome-pim-1-2"
> > oaf: "oaf-stable-0-6"
> > ORBit: "orbit-stable-0-5"
> > gtk+: "gtk-1-2"
> > glib: "glib-1-2"
> > control-center: "control-center-1-0"
> > libgtop: "LIBGTOP_STABLE_1_0"
> > gnome-xml: "LIB_XML_1_BRANCH"
> > gconf: "gconf-1-0"
> 
> And gedit: "gedit-1-0"
> pybliographer also has a stable branch. (something like v_1_0_x)
> You can check the exact name of a branch by using the following cvs command:
> 
> cvs -z3 status -v some_file_in_the_module
> 
> All branches and tags are listed.

Thanks for the information.
Does evolution and nautilus also have stable branches?

I did use the status command of cvs, but a lot of tags turned
up and it was hard to see which was the "stable" one.

Is the "stable" branches the ones we are heading for in release 1.4?

Keld