Re: po files and charset field
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld dkuug dk>
- To: Karl Eichwalder <keichwa gmx net>
- Cc: Pablo Saratxaga <pablo mandrakesoft com>, gnome-i18n gnome org,cm ggtt de, timar_a freemail hu, linux chrisime de,matthias kiefer gmx de
- Subject: Re: po files and charset field
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:48:30 +0100
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:27:52AM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> Pablo Saratxaga <pablo@mandrakesoft.com> writes:
>
> > Should they be made all utf-8 (I can take the task to convert all those
> > files if needed),
>
> I'd say yes. But it's arguable whether author have to write them
> directly with an UTF-8 editor or whether is better to build the final
> .desktop etc. files on the fly from other encoded input files (XML
> prefered).
I would prefer these desktop files to be marked with a charset
label. I have seen too may errors from people thinking
it was an 8859-1 file when it actually was an utf-8 file.
> > and for which release of Gnome should it be mandatory that they will
> > be all in utf-8 (with conversion to the real charset asked by the user
> > trough LC_CTYPE if needed).
>
> 2.0? For systems lacking glibc 2.2 it might be necessary to provide a
> configuration option to install encoded files with one of the
> traditional encodings (of course, them will have to accept other
> restrictions).
It really should not be mandatory.
Kind regards
keld
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]