Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

["Mike Emmel" <mike emmel gmail com>]

OSX was missed also btw the change Behdad had me make effected it too.

On 9/25/06, Loïc Minier <lool+gnome via ecp fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome
> > Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the
> > debian-installer.
>
>  I just cvs updated the gtk-2-10 branch, and it's still lacking these
>  fixes:
>  - replace "stuc" with "stub" in gtk/Makefile.am
>  - missing gtk/gtkplug-stub.c and gtksocket-stub.c files in the tarball
>  - fixes from this commit:
>     2006-09-13 Michael Emmel <mike emmel gmail com>
>        * gdk/directfb/gdkcolor-directfb.c small clean ups include order
>        * gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-directfb.c fixed beep compile error
>        * gdk/directfb/Makefile.am removed GDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
>            GDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED to allow compile per Behdad
>
>      (I've backported these files from HEAD:
>      gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/gdkcolor-directfb.c
>      gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-directfb.c
>      gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/Makefile.am
>      )
>
> > Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a
> > major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32 backends?
>
>  Would be nice.
>
> --
> Loïc Minier <lool dooz org>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list