Re: LSB summit in Boston

[Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>]

    LSB today includes non-Linux companies implementing Linux compatibility

(I presume you mean GNU/Linux compatibility.)

    for applications this way, and not all will use GNU code. The "Linux" in
    LSB is today arguably wrong, but for different reasons to those you
    assume. 

I take your point.  If these standards are for a broader range than
just GNU systems, then it would be a mistake to call them "GNU", just
as it is a mistake to call them "Linux".

If you want to participate in their efforts, could you please help
convince them to adopt a name that fits their activity?