El jue, 20 de 02 de 2003 a las 10:31, ERDI Gergo escribió: > [please CC replies to cactus cactus rulez org] > > On 20 Feb 2003, Carlos [ISO-8859-1] Perelló Marín wrote: > > > gnomoku > > HEAD is a GNOME 2 port, I don't see why it should be considered dead. > > > guikachu > > Whoa! whoooa! What do you mean by 'dead'? We had a new release a couple of > weeks ago, we have a solid TODO plan, now we even have a working GNOME 2 > port (but that's just experimental at the moment). Why would you consider > this dead? > > > Of course, both of these boil down to this: what makes you consider a > GNOME1-based package dead? Look at my mail again: "Here you have a really long list of what I think are dead modules (for GNOME 1.4 if that module has a GNOME 2 version, that one will no be removed)." Perhaps I didn't explain it well. DEAD == unmaintained anymore, no more releases, dead. As you tell me guikachu and gnomoku are DEAD (for GNOME 1.4 releases) so I want to remove them from GNOME 1.4 translation status pages but not from GNOME 2.0 status because that "brach" is alive. Do you understand me now? Cheers. -- Carlos Perelló Marín mailto:carlos gnome-db org mailto:carlos perello hispalinux es http://www.gnome-db.org http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature