Re: Gnome-bugsquad digest, Vol 1 #212 - 5 msgs



On 25 Apr 2003, John Fleck wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 01:52, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I've currently installed a procmail filter that puts any 
> > bug reports with Priority >= High in a special folder. I've also given the 
> > procmail rule to dave, so i guess he has it installed to. This means 
> > people just need to raise priority to High to get us to notice things 
> > faster. This can of course be abused, but I expect that won't be to common 
> > to be a bother.
> > 
> > As long as all nautilus bug triagers know this I think it will work as 
> > well as a separate list.
> >  
> 
> It would be most useful (to me, at least) if you could give us some
> guidelines about what you see as type of Priority->High bugs you'd like
> to have appearing in that mailbox.

Well, this is hard of course, since it depends very much on the details. 
There are some things I always want to see:
* bugs with patches that need reviewing
* build failures (except the "I messed up my system" style)
* easily repeatable crashers (that not only the reporter can reproduce)
* strange, highly dup:ed crashers, with at least one good backtrace

Then I'm always interested in good quality bugreports that are not of the 
wishlist variety. If you think a bug is "severe" then I'm probably 
interested, although this is an area where you'll have to use your 
own judgement.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's a benighted crooked master criminal in a wheelchair. She's a 
strong-willed African-American mermaid who can talk to animals. They fight 
crime! 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]