Re: Ideas w/r/t HIG spacing and indentation guidelines
- From: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>
- To: jody gnome org, hp redhat com
- Cc: bill haneman sun com, mawarkus t-online de, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Ideas w/r/t HIG spacing and indentation guidelines
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:43:03 +0100 (BST)
There is a misunderstanding here.
The patch I sent Jody recently removed the setting of the LABEL_FOR relation as
that is done automatically by GAIL.
The creation of the LABELLED_BY relation is not done automatically in GAIL and
this is the subject of bug 72249.
Padraig
> Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org> writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:00:27PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > >
> > > Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org> writes:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:12:19PM +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > > > > gtk_label_set_mnemonic_widget (label, widget);
> > > > >
> > > > > I will check with Padraig, but this may already set up the ATK
relations
> > > > > automagically; if not, it certainly could and should be made to do so.
> > > >
> > > > It does.
> > >
> > > It doesn't, or at least the bug on it is still open
> > > (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72249).
> >
> > Odd, Padraig sent me a patch the removed the atk relations while
> > adding mnemonic_widget and claimed that this did work.
>
> That would be cool - I want to lose all the ATK relation cruft from
> gnome-terminal. Padraig?
>
> Havoc
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]