Re: intltool

[jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>]

On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 14:24, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com> writes: 
> > intltool is supposed to obsolete xml-i18n-tools; that's what the cvs spec
> > file does. If you decide that instead it should provide xml-i18n-tools that
> > would be OK too I guess. I don't really understand the distinction in the
> > RPM world.
> > 
> 
> You do both, provide and also obsolete. This is so that old packages'
> requirements for xml-i18n-tools can be filled by an intltool package.

iirc what doesn't work if one does this is if other packages have
"Requires: xml-i18n-tools >= foo".

am i incorrect here?

jacob 
--