Re: intltool



On 5 Oct 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com> writes:
> > intltool is supposed to obsolete xml-i18n-tools; that's what the cvs spec
> > file does. If you decide that instead it should provide xml-i18n-tools that
> > would be OK too I guess. I don't really understand the distinction in the
> > RPM world.
>
> You do both, provide and also obsolete. This is so that old packages'
> requirements for xml-i18n-tools can be filled by an intltool package.

Yeah, have it packaged and running. It works perfectly without any problem.
Anyway, intltool was just sort of like a rename of xml-i18n-tools.

Abel





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]