Re: Let's look into the future (aka "The ``Martin is back'' mail")
- From: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
- To: glynn foster sun com
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: Let's look into the future (aka "The ``Martin is back'' mail")
- Date: 21 Jun 2001 13:51:49 -0400
> Okay...so I briefly mentioned this on #gnome - the need for a new GNOME
> druid interface...and well it got a majority vote
>
> The current one is yucky [sorry Jonathan :)] and this should be somewhat
> of a priority for the usability guys for 2.0. It should be pretty easy
> to implement when someone comes up with a final design. Hacking it to
> make it look prettier shouldn't have to happen, especially for 2.0.
> Let's give it some GNOME loving [sigh, I never thought I'd use that
> phrase] :)
No offense taken at all. I'm the first to admit that the current one is
not all that pretty -- I just tried to whip something out in the hopes
that someone with more artistic talent than I could clean it up
later[1]. I think that there are three things need to happen with the
GnomeDruid setup, which would end a lot of problems with it:
1) At a minimum an (optional) help button needs to be added to
GnomeDruid. Other ideas might be adding a button box so that people
can add their own buttons, or maybe add a mechanism to let people add
their own buttons. I'm not 100% sure that more buttons are good in
most cases, though.
2) Change GnomeDruidPage from a virtual base class to a container. This
way people can just create one and put whatever they want in it.
3) The GtkWidget::focus method needs fixing.
Thanks,
-Jonathan
[1] A common occurrence in GNOME, unfortunately. (-:
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]