Re: subversion on (Re: Putting MonoDevelop into gnome's cvs repo)

Bill Haneman wrote:

Well, that would be ideal - but it pushes the subversion dependency out beyond gnome cvs to "clients" of gnome cvs, which is less ideal (more stuff to admin).

I think that is a given if we are going to move on to more sophisticated version control systems.

Remember that we will still be making regular tarball releases (which is what people currently use if they don't want to take on the cvs dependency).

Naturally we will want to have some policy for modules in the developer platform and desktop releases (having 20 different VC systems would be bad), and this thread seems to have turned into a discussion about what this policy should be.


Email: james daa com au

gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]